Showing posts with label 1000 Books Project. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1000 Books Project. Show all posts

Friday, January 2, 2026

2025 Yearly Challenges - Wrap-Up Post

This is the wrap-up post for the 2025 yearly challenges...

2025 Book to Movie and 2025 Read Your Shelf.

A wrap-up for the 1000 Books Project 2025 - Sigrid Undset's Kristin Lavransdatter is not necessary, as it's essentially read-alongs which we discuss as we read. It will not be linked below for wrap-ups.

I'm posting the links to the 2025 challenges below. If you completed the challenge (or even if you didn't) and you post a wrap-up, please link up in the original linky on the challenge sign up post. When you put your name/blog name, just add "wrap-up." Like so: truebookaddict/wrap-up

Here are the links to the 2025 challenges:

2025 Read Your Shelf Challenge

2025 Book to Movie Reading Challenge

Be sure to leave a comment on the post so I know you added your wrap-up.

In case you missed the sign-up for this year's yearly challenges, you can find them below.

2026 Read Your Shelf Challenge

2026 Book to Movie (and TV) Reading Challenge

1000 Books Project 2026: Charles Darwin

Here's to a new year of reading!

Wednesday, December 31, 2025

1000 Books Project 2026 - Charles Darwin


Project Backstory:
I picked up a copy of James Mustich's amazing 1000 Books to Read Before You Die: A Life Changing List and upon looking through it, I realized it really is a well-rounded reading recommendation book. I was pleased to discover I have read quite a few of the books he lists, and that many of them are on my personal reading lists (and they are books I own). So, to ever expand my reading horizons, and include others in the journey, I decided to create a read-along challenge, or project, if you will.

It's fairly obvious that the United States is in a constitutional crisis. We may as well say we are a country in crisis...period. Logic, kindness, equality, science, books and literature are all becoming products of the past, at least in the eyes of the current regime. Well, I for one have been taking a stand, and I will keep taking a stand in any way I can until we get past this mess. 

1000 Books will be focusing on topics listed above (and more) for the foreseeable future. Science, social justice, history (true history), government, banned books, etc. because Reading Is Political.
"It was only recently that I realized that it is a privilege to have access to my books and these stories. I have the material capital to purchase books from bookstores and easy access to a public library. I have the education it takes to read the words on the pages and the comprehension skills to understand what they are saying.

Reading is fun, yes. It is enjoyable, it is a good pastime, it is a good skill to have and to hone.

But we must also never forget that reading is political.

Not everyone has the privilege of engaging with ideas found in books. Literacy is still inaccessible for many people, and even for those who can read, the ability to access books is actively being threatened. When books are banned, when libraries are defunded, when stories are erased from curriculums, we are stripping people of the opportunity to learn, grow and think critically. The ability to read and read freely is not just a personal joy — it should be considered a fundamental right.

It feels strange to write that in the 21st century, this right is under attack. While our very institutions work to limit our access to books and knowledge, we can push back. We can challenge censorship, support libraries, share books and advocate for literacy programs. Reading is a privilege, yes — but it is also an act of resistance."

From an article in The Pitt News by Livia LaMarca (February 25, 2025) Read the full article here.

I chose Darwin's The Origin of Species (and The Voyage of the Beagle) because, for me, Darwin's discovery of evolution is one of the most important discoveries in science. Yet there are still many who believe the earth is only 6000 years old. It's really no surprise that it's the most commonly banned science book.

A Censored Science Book for Banned Books Week

"I was not at all surprised to discover that the most commonly banned science book is Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species, first published in 1859 and banned in 1895 for contradicting Christian beliefs. Darwin’s publication has been called “the most influential banned book.” On the Origin of Species lays the groundwork for modern evolutionary biology. Very little about science is understandable without a basic knowledge of Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection.

As a former secondary science teacher, I know the importance of accurately teaching evolution as well as encouraging students to learn more about Darwin’s theory. It’s doubly important today as science naysayers spread misinformation that influence public and political decision making. Genetics, population biology, and even epidemiology, especially the study of pathogens that evolve rapidly like the COVID-19 virus, all depend on an understanding of evolution. According to a 2011 article from the National Center for Biotechnology Information, knowledge of the fundamental basics of evolutionary biology is necessary to the understanding of disease and public health.

I think Charles Darwin would agree. Darwin studied hundreds of plants and animals as he traveled around the world on the British ship H.M.S. Beagle in 1831. He observed that no two individuals in a population are exactly alike, and he recognized how favorable inherited variations influence the success of a species. A majority of Darwin’s observations were made during his visit to the Galápagos Islands, and today the Charles Darwin Research Station on Santa Cruz Island helps conserve this laboratory of life."

Article by Kellyanne Burbage on the Intellectual Freedom Blog (September 30, 2021) Read the full article here.

We will read The Origin of Species first, January through May, and The Voyage of the Beagle in June, July, and August. 

My edition of The Origin of Species - Gramercy Books (Random House), 1979. Hardcover, 460 pages. The Foreword and Gallery of Animal Illustrations (as well as the Glossary at the back), are not included in the reading schedule.

Reading schedule for The Origin of Species:
  • January: A Historical Sketch - Ch. 3, pp 53 - 129
    Discussion: January 31
  • February: Ch. 4 - 6, pp 130 - 233
    Discussion: February 28
  • March: Ch. 7 - 9, pp 234 - 316
    Discussion: March 31
  • April: Ch. 10 - 12, pp 317 - 396
    Discussion: April 30
  • May: Ch. 13 - 14, pp 397 - 459
    Discussion: May 31
My edition of The Voyage of the Beagle - Open Road Media, 2016. Kindle, 388 pages. Since this Kindle book does not include page numbers, I had to base the schedule on chapters alone.
  • June: Ch. 1 - 7
    Discussion: June 30
  • July: Ch. 8 - 14
    Discussion: July 31
  • August: Ch. 15 -21
    Discussion: August 31
Discussions will be posted here on the blog on the dates indicated in the schedules. Feel free to stop by the discussions any time. Post your thoughts in the comments, or share a link to a blog post.

I have a Goodreads group that is now defunct called Lit Collective. I'm planning to change that group over to a group for Gather Together and Read so there will be a thread for 1000 Books on there as well. I will update this post with a link to the group for you to join if you're on Goodreads.

If you would like to join us, sign up by leaving a comment below (and a link, if you post about it on your blog or social media).

Thursday, September 4, 2025

1000 Books Project - Kristin Lavransdatter Discussion Three (Final Discussion)


Spoilers ahead...do not read if you haven't read the book and/or if spoilers bother you.

I finished the book on Sunday and found myself having to step away for several days before I could come to terms with my feelings. This third book of the trilogy, The Cross, pretty much wrecked me.

Having two sons myself, and struggling through empty-nest-syndrome for the past several years, once again I found myself relating to Kristin and what she was experiencing with her sons. Even with the hundreds of years separating modern times from medieval times, I think it is a relatable experience with mothers, particularly mothers of sons. Sons do not cling so steadfastly to their mothers as daughters do. It's a sad trait of our society...that being a "momma's boy" is a bad thing and makes you less of a man. Unfortunately, no matter how hard you work raising them to know it's okay to feel and express emotions, that they don't have to act a certain way just because they were born boys, somehow the societal pressures seep in. 

I flagged some passages that really resonated with me and the connection I felt to Kristin and her motherly strife...
And was she now to see her strife end thus? -- Had she but reared a brood of restless eyases (young falcons), who lay in her nest impatiently waiting the hour when their wings would bear them out over the farthest blue fells -- ? And their father clapped his hands together and laughed -- fly, fly, my young birds --

Bloody fibres from her heart's roots would they drag with them when they took flight, and they would know naught of it. And she would be left behind to sit alone, and all the heart-strings which once bound her to this old home of hers she herself had torn asunder long ago --Surely 'twould be such a life as is neither life nor death. (pp. 790 - 791) 

 ......

Her eyes had been opened now to see that, after the young mother's pains and travail are over, there comes for the ageing mother fears and woe of a new kind. -- His careless talk of having no fear for the fortunes of their sons had goaded her till she was like a wild mother-bear -- or like a bitch with whelps; she cared not if Erlend likened her to a bitch in all that touched her children. For them would she be watchful and unsleeping as a mother-bitch, so long as life abode in her. (p. 800)

Speaking of Erlend, was there no end to the strife he caused throughout the book? To up and leave as he did, putting the reputation of Kristin and her sons even more at jeopardy. And then not coming to Kristin when their last son is born, or even acknowledging the child...what else were people to think than that she conceived the child with Ulf (of course, his wife didn't help matters). Erlend's actions led to false accusations, violence, and eventually led to his death. Yes, I believe he loved Kristin, but pride was a factor with him and he didn't get involved until his pride was being attacked, and by then it was too late. Still though, his death was very sad and I felt such anguish for Nikolaus when Kristin would not allow him by his father's deathbed. By this time, it was obvious that Kristin no longer loved him in the way she had before, but she still cared about him and his immortal soul. 

When Kristin is displaced by the marriage of Gaute and Jofrid, it was obvious she felt she no longer had a purpose which led to her decision to make the pilgrimage to Nidaros. Her apprehension over meeting her two older sons was easy to understand since she had strongly felt that Nikolaus was not meant to take the robe. Yet she is determined to once and for all let her sons live their lives as their destinies planned, though it was hard for her.

And if now she obeyed the call without too ill a grace, she knew 'twas because she saw that Gaute would thrive better when she was gone from the Manor. She had bent fate to her will, she had had the lot of her own choice -- but her sons she could not fashion after her will; they were as God had fashioned them, and their natures drove them on; striving with them she must be worsted. (p. 997)

The depiction of the Black Death was frightening, as it always is when I read books set in medieval times. The attempted sacrifice of the young boy and the courage of Kristin and the nuns to rescue him was astounding. When I had first read about this trilogy of novels, I guess I assumed that Kristin would live to an older age. I was not prepared for her quick death from the plague. I cried and felt such regret that she only was able to see Nikolaus, Bjorgulf, and Skule again before she died. Being a devout Christian, I realize she knew she would see the ones who passed before again, including her sons who had died young. It was still hard to read nonetheless. Kristin was such a brave and steadfast character. This depiction of a medieval woman's hopes, sorrows, and struggles will stay with me, and remind me once again how strong women must be to be mothers to their children. 

Once she saw Munan's face -- her little son peeped in at her through a half-open door. Then he drew back his head, and the mother lay gazing at the door -- if perchance the boy might peep out again. But instead came Lady Ragnhild and wiped her face with a wet cloth; and that too was good -- Then all things were lost in a dark red mist, and a roar, that first grew fearsomely; but then it died away little by little, and the red mist grew thinner and lighter, and at last 'twas like a fair morning mist ere the sun breaks through, and all sound ceased, and she knew now she was dying -- (p. 1046)


What are your thoughts on book three, The Cross? Share any and all thoughts in the comments.

I hope you enjoyed this year's 1000 Books selection. Thank you for reading along and discussing. 

I have plans for the next few years of our "projects" and I will be sharing our 2026 selection(s) earlier this year...probably in early October. Stay tuned!

Sunday, June 8, 2025

1000 Books Project - Kristin Lavransdatter Discussion Two

Spoilers ahead...do not read if you haven't read the book and/or if spoilers bother you.


One week late with this discussion post. I apologize profusely. We readers know first hand how sometimes real life gets in the way of our reading. I can only strive to do better for our next (and final discussion). 

This will probably be a fairly lengthy post. I have many page flags poking out throughout The Mistress of Husaby. 

I first would like to touch on when Erlend discovers that Kristin was pregnant when they married. I was not happy with his reaction. What did he expect her to do, with her already feeling full of shame? She was trying, in her youthful, unwise way, to not make things worse. And Erlend should have kept in mind her youth, and that it takes two to tango. Imagine how she felt, enduring almost the entire pregnancy alone. It speaks volumes to me that she is indeed more an adult than her older husband.

I stayed angry with Erlend for most of this second book. When Kristin tells him she is with child again, their second child, he says: "Methoughts when once you were mine--'twould be like drinking Yule-tide every day. But it looks as though most of the time would be long fasts." 
Really? What did you think marriage was going to be like, Erlend? In the times before birth control, especially way back in history as this story is, when you had sex, you would most likely get pregnant. Women had very little choice on how many children they had, and each time they went into labor, it was like staring death in the face. But back to his flippant words above. So, since Kristin was so young and beautiful it was just going to be all fun and no duty? Sorry to say, Erlend...in your time marriage meant child after child and with that great responsibility. (Don't even get me started on him hitting Kristin...infuriating!)

After the second child Bjorgulf is born, once again Erlend is lamenting the responsibility and how sickly Kristin is. "Kristin lulled the child softly. The thin small tones of her voice irked him." Then a few minutes later..."He longed to leave her!" Granted, he is afraid of what she will go through with the next birth, but he is also overwhelmed by it all. He loves her, but he's also selfish in his thinking that having married her, "all evil would be wiped away from his life so wholly that he would forget it had ever been." But you can't expect another person to miraculously heal what you yourself have wrought. It speaks to Erlend's childish and reckless nature, which Kristin is learning more of every day.

Amidst the anger felt with this first book was also immense sadness. When Kristin realizes that Lavrans is not long for the world, it is such a heart wrenching scene between father and daughter. It hit home for me, as I was always close with my dad, but over the past 15 years or so, something has driven a wedge between us (you might guess what it is). I still speak to him on a regular basis, but it's not the same. He is 78 now and I feel such sadness that things are this way so close to the end of his life. I sobbed when I read the above scene, and I'm sobbing now. 

I know death is something we all face when our parents become aged. My mom is my best friend. We have always been close and we have lived together for 13 years. She will be 75 in August so I find myself dreading the inevitable. I'm sorry if this seems off topic, but I promise I'm going somewhere with this. When Kristin goes to the chapel to pray over her stepson's grave (Orm...I was so devastated when he died), her thoughts go..."She thought upon her beloved dead--their looks and their voices and smiles and ways and bearing--now that they themselves were gone away to yonder other country, to think on their shapes was sore; 'twas like remembering one's home when one knew that it stood desolate, and the rotting timbers were sinking into the soil." More sobbing on my part. It is part of life that we must endure this, but it's just so unfair that life is so short and we must eventually say goodbye to the ones we love.


Now touching on Erlend and Kristin's marital strife again. Erlend likes to play the blame game. Implying that much of what transpired with his daughter was her fault, when she could never say anything to the girl without Erlend telling her to let Margret be. It was during this heated exchange, where much was said about present and past events, that Erlend struck Kristin again. He professes to apologize, but what does he expect...her not to be angry? More heated words and then Erlend leaves, his final thought being..."Troll she was--and so fair, too--if only he could beat her until she grew good again..." WHAT?! So what does he do? Goes and sleeps with another woman. Typical. This will come back and bite him later, as we find out.
But a man committing adultery, it's never their fault. Erlend: "Since he had broken his troth to Kristin already--and she herself had brought it about, by her hateful and unjust ways towards him--" 

Motherhood. I'm glad that Kristin finds some peace and contentment because of her children. All those boys! As a boy mom myself, I can relate (though I only have two). This one hit home for me too, having not very long ago dealt with the emptying nest.
"Over again and over again had joy in them quickened the beating of her heart, fear for them pierced it--they were her children, these great lads with their lean angular boys' bodies, as they had been when they were so small and plump they could scarce hurt themselves when they tumbled in their journeys between the bench and her knee. They were hers, even as they had been when, as she would lift one of them from the cradle up to her breast for milk, she had to hold up its head , because it nodded on the slender neck as a bluebell nods on its stalk. Wherever they might wander out in the world, whithersoever they might fare, forgetful of their mother, she felt as though for her their life must still be an action of her life, they must still be as one with herself as they had been when she alone in all the world knew of the new life which lay hidden within and drank of her blood and made her cheeks pale." 
SOB! Another life event we must endure, those of us who have children. The inevitable flying from the nest, but they never truly leave us.

Erlend's arrest and Simon's goodness. Though Erlend did what he did for the good of Norway, he was also very careless, which we have learned is his nature in this second book. His dealings with Lady Sunniva got him more than he bargained for. She wasn't so stupid as he thought. Definitely a man who does not carefully consider before acting. Yet this is where we learn how truly Kristin loves him still, and he her. Marriage is complicated and it seemed even more so in their time. Simon, who we learn is just a downright good person, goes above and beyond to help save Erlend. When he confronts Sir Erling about what happened with Halfrid (bargaining chip, bribery?), it is out of character for him, and he regrets it, but it shows how much he truly cares for Kristin and even Erlend. Sir Erling angrily brings up what happened between Kristin and Erlend and how she broke her promise of marriage to another. Simon selflessly admits it was him who was wronged. It could not have been easy for him to admit this, but this is what changes Sir Erling's mind on helping Erlend when he sees what Simon is willing to do for his family. 

And so, they go to the king and Sir Erling's son diabolically alludes to King Magnus's secret...and that's the end of it. Erland is free. Side note: King Magnus was king of Norway and Sweden from 1319 - 1364. There were actually rumors of homosexuality and other "erotic escapades" during his reign. 

The Mistress of Husaby is my favorite of the three so far. Undset did an excellent job of depicting life in medieval Norway, touching masterfully on themes of marriage, motherhood, faith, adultery, kinship, and loyalty. I'm looking forward to reading the concluding third book.

What are your thoughts on book two, The Mistress of Husaby (or The Wife)? Share any and all thoughts in the comments.

Here is the reading schedule if you need to reference it again. (Click link and scroll down)

I'll be back on August 31 with the discussion post on book three, The Cross.

Thursday, March 6, 2025

1000 Books Project - Kristin Lavransdatter Discussion One

Spoilers ahead...do not read if you haven't read the book and/or if spoilers bother you.


I apologize profoundly for how late I am with this first discussion post. I planned my reading very poorly and found myself way behind. For the second leg of our reading, I will try to stay better on track. Thank you for bearing with me!

I'll admit I was worried that this novel might be dry...boring...though I had been told by my good friend Lucy that it was an excellent read. She was not wrong (not that I ever doubted her). I have thoroughly enjoyed our first section, The Bridal Wreath (The Wreath). 

First, a quick question on what version you are reading? My edition, as mentioned in the announcement post, is Abacus (January 1, 1995) - Paperback, 1072 pages. This is a republish of the original translation by Charles Archer and J.S. Scott. This translation was criticized for its use of archaic language (reflecting the novel's 14th century setting) and also for expurgations, as some scenes, particularly sexually explicit ones, had been omitted or edited. Apparently, the newer Penguin Classics translation by Tina Nunnally has been praised for its clarity and does not make the expurgations as in the earlier translation. (Source)
Personally, I'm not having a problem with the language in my edition. I have read historical fiction extensively, and many classics which use archaic language, so that has not been a deal breaker for me. I'm also not upset about the purged sexually explicit scenes. It's easy enough to put two and two together without having it described explicitly. If you are reading the newer translation, let me know your thoughts.

I first want to briefly touch on Lady Aashild. When she is called upon to help heal Ulvhild, we learn that she has been rumored to be a witch. The age old suspicion when a woman knows about healing...well, she must be a witch. I liked Lady Aashild and her being sort of a mentor to Kristin. 

I have never been fond of the tradition of arranged marriages. It was obvious that Kristin was not thrilled with the idea of Simon as her betrothed. At that point, I think her father's happiness was utmost in her mind. When she learns that Arne truly loved her and would have had her to wife (barred by their social standing it seemed), and then the dreadful experience with Bentein, I think she truly starts to consider herself and her own feelings. Then we know she is having serious doubts about the bethrothal. Though she is clearly devastated by Arne's death, I think her desire to go to the nunnery for a year was also a way for her to delay the marriage and perhaps figure a way out of it...though I don't think she quite anticipated it happening the way it did. 


The meeting of Erlend was a great example of the chivalry of the time. The damsel(s) in distress and the dashing knight who comes to the rescue. Not surprising that a girl of 17 would be so impressed and fall so easily for him. I guess I'm not very romantic because I kind of thought of Erlend as taking advantage of Kristin's young age and her naivete. Then the unthinkable happens...sexual relations outside of marriage. Egads! But for the time, it was scandalous for a maiden of high breeding (or any maiden, for that matter) to have relations with a man she was not wed to. Setting aside the romantic, I'll admit to feeling a bit on the edge of my seat on what would happen next with Erlend and Kristin. Would they be found out? Is she pregnant? Is Erlend really a cad, and will he end up leaving her in the dust? I never thought her father would approve the marriage so when they make their plan to run off together via Lady Aashild's home, it was getting exciting...and then Eline shows up! Somehow I knew that was going to happen. I was shocked when she tried to poison Kristin and being still such a naive girl, she almost drank it! Luckily, Erlend walked in when he did. What an awful thing to have forced Eline to drink the poison. However deserving she was or not, I feel like that occurrence added a heaviness to their courtship that was not there previously. 

Finally Kristin's father agrees to the marriage, though begrudgingly, and the preparations begin. Then...Kristin is pregnant?! Another nail biting part where I kept waiting for someone to notice and bring about yet another scandal. All the while, I can't help but notice how Erlend just does not take anything very seriously. But then, the wedding is done. Phew! In the final scene between Lavrans and Ragnfrid, we find out that Ragnfrid was also not a maid when she married Lavrans. I wondered why Ragnfrid, who always seemed the more strict parent toward Kristin, was not as mad and was more understanding of Kristin's situation than her father. Now we know why. 

My final thoughts: I feel like Undset's depiction of the consequences of adultery rang true to me. That it happened more frequently than is normally depicted in classic novels is my conclusion. When we talk of "love at first sight" maybe that should be more like "love at first attraction." Kristin was attracted to the chivalry and perhaps the excitement of their "courtship" though she also had trouble reconciling that with her religious beliefs and feelings of being sinful. I think she is going to find that Erlend is not quite all he seemed to be at first sight. Sadly, such is the way of many relationships as time wears on. 

What are your thoughts on our first section, The Bridal Wreath (or The Wreath)? Share any and all thoughts in the comments.

Here is the reading schedule if you need to reference it again. (Click link and scroll down)

I'll be back on May 31 with the discussion post on our next section, The Mistress of Husaby (or The Wife).

Friday, January 3, 2025

2024 Yearly Challenges - Wrap-Up Post

This is the wrap-up post for the 2024 yearly challenges...

2024 Book to Movie and 2024 Read Your Shelf.

A wrap-up for the 1000 Books Project 2024: Collins/Dickens is not necessary, as it's essentially read-alongs which we discuss as we read. It will not be linked below for wrap-ups.

I'm posting the links to the 2024 challenges below. If you completed the challenge (or even if you didn't) and you post a wrap-up, please link up in the original linky on the challenge sign up post. When you put your name/blog name, just add "wrap-up." Like so: truebookaddict/wrap-up

Here are the links to the 2024 challenges:

2024 Read Your Shelf Challenge

2024 Book to Movie Reading Challenge

Be sure to leave a comment on the post so I know you added your wrap-up.

In case you missed the sign-up for this year's yearly challenges, you can find them below.

2025 Read Your Shelf Challenge

2025 Book to Movie (and TV) Reading Challenge

1000 Books Project 2025: Sigrid Undset's Kristin Lavransdatter

Here's to a new year of reading!

Sunday, December 29, 2024

1000 Books Project 2025 - Sigrid Undset's Kristin Lavransdatter


Project Backstory:
I picked up a copy of James Mustich's amazing 1000 Books to Read Before You Die: A Life Changing List and upon looking through it, I realized it really is a well-rounded reading recommendation book. I was pleased to discover I have read quite a few of the books he lists, and that many of them are on my personal reading lists (and they are books I own). So, to ever expand my reading horizons, and include others in the journey, I decided to create a read-along challenge, or project, if you will.

The theme for this year...and it's an important theme given the current situation in our country (U.S.) in regards to women (one example - your body, my choice)...Honoring women: A woman's life saga.


Kristin Lavransdatter
by Sigrid Undset is the work that formed the basis of Undset receiving the 1928 Nobel Prize in Literature, which was awarded to her "principally for her powerful descriptions of Northern life during the Middle Ages." (Wikipedia source)

A passage from the 1000 Books' coverage of the book (page 817): 

A summary does not do justice to Undset's achievement, nor to the singularity of her central character, who maintains a riveting identity in the midst of her struggles with family, community, and convention. Next to Kristin Lavransdatter, Emma Bovary is bloodless. In her book, 13 Ways of Looking at the Novel, Jane Smiley astutely describes Kristin's--and Undset's--originality:

Perhaps the biggest difference between Undset's protagonist and most other female protagonists is that she is never without work to do...Life is arduous in a way that is never true in novels about women of the middle and upper classes in France and England. Undset writes about work and weather and famine and accidents, illnesses, pregnancy, animals, and the natural world with immediacy and ease. Though Undset, too, explores the classic conflict between female virtue and female desire she sets it into the context of female usefulness.

I've been wanting to read this book for a long time. I hope you will join me.

Since we are starting on January 1st, I'm posting the reading schedule now. 

My edition: Abacus (January 1, 1995) - Paperback, 1072 pages.

Discussions will be posted here on the blog on the dates indicated in the schedule. Feel free to stop by the discussions any time. Post your thoughts in the comments, or share a link to a blog post.

The schedule does not include the notes section at the back of the book. The ending page in my edition is 1,047. We are reading according to each book of the original trilogy.
  • January/February: The Bridal Wreath, pp 1 - 272
    Discussion post: February 28
  • March/April/May: The Mistress of Husaby, pp 273 - 643
    Discussion post: May 31
  • June/July/August: The Cross, pp 645 - 1047 (end)
    Discussion post: August 31
If you would like to join us, sign up by leaving a comment below (and a link, if you post about it on your blog or social media).

Wednesday, October 30, 2024

1000 Books Project - Nicholas Nickleby Final Discussion

Spoilers ahead...final thoughts...do not read if you haven't read the book and/or if spoilers bother you.


I finished! I feel like throwing a party! 😄

While this one was tough to get through due to the sheer breadth of it, I thoroughly enjoyed it. It helped that I was able to listen to some of it on Book Radio. That way I could listen while I was doing other things. 

What I love most about Dickens is his ability to tell a story with a large cross section of characters and somehow tying them together in the story. 

Nicholas is such an admirable character, despite his tendency to get extremely angry. I can't say I blame him though. So much outrage due to the poor treatment of Smike and his sister. Smike's death is so heartbreaking. What a hard life he had, and then he didn't even get to live a full life. At least his last years were spent in happiness with Nicholas and his family. 

As happens in many a Dickens novel, the "evil" characters get their comeuppance. What a shame that Ralph Nickleby was such a miserable person. He could have been happy if he could have seen past his greed. He needed visits from three spirits, but that's another story...

What are your final thoughts on the book? Share any and all thoughts in the comments.

If you joined in on the read-along, thank you! Hope to see you for our next 1000 Books Project!

I'm working on our book selection for 2025. I'm thinking we will do one book over the entire year, or for eight months. Stay tuned for the announcement.

Saturday, August 24, 2024

1000 Books Project - Nicholas Nickleby Discussion Two

Spoilers ahead...do not read if you haven't read the book and/or if spoilers bother you.


I am seriously behind on this discussion post and I sincerely apologize. While I love reading Dickens, he can be long-winded at times...or perhaps not so much long-winded, as lofty in his introduction of characters. Honestly, I don't know how the man kept up with all of these characters. 

When he titled this The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby, he was not kidding. Nicholas has had so many experiences for such a young man. I loved the parts when he (and Smike) acted in Mr. Crummles' theater troupe. I can imagine him as quite the dashing leading man. His popularity with the audiences caused some jealousy within the company. I thought that scene was quite entertaining. Nicholas has a
temper. They truly don't know who they're messing with...which Ralph is getting ready to find out. Evil man. What he has caused to happen to poor Kate is horrifying. Now I see why they were so fussy back then for young women to have a chaperone. She clearly needed one in her situation. Of course, she, and her mother, did not suspect that her Uncle would be so cruel. I think they are finding out now just how morally bankrupt he really is. Greed is at the root of his antics. He does seem to have a soft spot for Kate, even though it seems impossible. But just when you think he might be redeemable after all, he says to himself about wishing Nicholas and their mother dead so Kate could live with him. Wow.

I'm not going to say much more at the moment. I'll just say that I am enjoying it, though it's slow going. I am considering listening to some of it on audio. One of the newsletters I subscribe to mentioned this public domain audio book site and I found Nicholas Nickleby on there. If you want to check it out, it's called Book Radio.

What did you think of the this section of our reading? Share any and all thoughts in the comments.

Here is the reading schedule if you need to reference it again. (Click link and scroll down)
I'll be back on August 31 (hopefully) with the next discussion post.

Wednesday, August 7, 2024

Important Updates!


I have a few important updates to share...

New URL
I had to let my domain for this site go, so it has reverted back to this URL: https://gathertogetherread.blogspot.com/
If you have any of the buttons from this site on your blog, you will need to update the link to the above URL. That also goes for RSS feeds, etc. I apologize for the inconvenience.

1000 Books Project...Nicholas Nickleby read-along
I am once again behind on the reading. Oof. I'm hoping to be caught up in the next couple of days and will post the discussion soon. Thanks for bearing with me.

Stephen King Challenge participants...
It's almost time for Castle Macabre's Something Wicked Fall and we are once again going to be doing a read-along of a Stephen King book. I have a poll live for people to vote for which SK book they would like to read for the read-along. Vote here: https://forms.gle/pg97xSoV6TpyXbbZ6


Here is the event graphic!


That's it for now. If you have any questions, leave me a comment below.

Monday, July 8, 2024

1000 Books Project - Nicholas Nickleby Discussion One

Spoilers ahead...do not read if you haven't read the book and/or if spoilers bother you.


Dickens was so good at portraying the less fortunate of his time. Children who had no rights and were often mistreated. Women, whose husbands have died, and are left destitute, thrown at the mercy of often unkind relatives. And his villains! Probably some of the most detestable in the history of literature. Ralph Nickleby and the Squeers. We have so far only had glimpses of the truly horrible nature of their uncle, but we know fully well just how despicable are the Squeers. Their treatment of the boys, and especially poor Smike, makes me so angry!

I have to mention also the introduction of all these side characters who are so entertaining and interesting. How Dickens kept up with all these characters...I don't know! The Kenwigs and Mr. Gregsbury. Regarding the latter, when he was describing the duties of the secretary job, I thought to myself it sounds like he would be doing your job for you. Luckily, Nicholas was smart enough not to take the job.

Looking forward to moving on to the next reading section to see what's next for young Mr. Nickleby.

I watched the 2002 film again the other night. I have seen it many times. I really love it. I usually wait until I've finished the book to rewatch the film, but I was compelled to watch it at the beginning of the book instead. It is a very well-done film, with great performances. It seems to stay fairly close to the book, though I won't know for sure until I've read the whole book. Anyway, I recommend the film. You can watch it for free on Tubi. I noticed there are other adaptations so I may seek them out as well.


What did you think of the this section of our reading? Share any and all thoughts in the comments.

Here is the reading schedule if you need to reference it again. (Click link and scroll down)
I'll be back on July 31 with the next discussion post.

Monday, July 1, 2024

1000 Books - Nicholas Nickleby update


I'm running a bit behind this month on the reading. I'll have the first discussion posted by the end of the week. Thanks for bearing with me!

Friday, May 31, 2024

1000 Books Project 2024 - Nicholas Nickleby Reading Schedule


Just a refresher on this year's project. I chose Collins/Dickens because of Collins' birthday in January (we read The Moonstone in January - April) and his friendship with Dickens. 

From the this year's original challenge post:

Our second selection for this year's project is The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby by Charles Dickens. Because he is Dickens after all, Mustich does not focus on just one book by the prolific author. His write up about Dickens in 1000 Books can be found on pages 215 - 222, with commentary on Nicholas Nickleby on page 218. He refers to the book as "Pure Storytelling Bliss."

This read-along will run from June - September.

My edition: Oxford University Press (The Oxford Illustrated Dickens) 1987 - hardcover, 831 pages.


Discussions will be posted here on the blog on the dates indicated in the schedule. Feel free to stop by the discussions any time. Post your thoughts in the comments, or share a link to a blog post.

Reading Schedule
  • June: Ch. 1 - 16, pp 1 - 204
    Discussion post: June 30
  • July: Ch. 17 - 31, pp 205 - 407
    Discussion post: July 31
  • August: Ch. 32 - 46, pp 408 - 608
    Discussion post: August 31
  • September: Ch. 47 - 65, pp 609 - 831 (end)
    Discussion post: September 30
I hope you will join me!

Tuesday, April 30, 2024

1000 Books Project 2024 - The Moonstone Final Discussion


If you have not been reading along, be aware of potential spoilers ahead.

I really enjoyed this book! I think I'm liking Collins' books almost as much as Dickens. 

The conclusion was quite satisfying, especially since I suspected Godfrey Ablewhite, and before he was revealed as the dead sailor, I knew it was him. Not sure why...he just rubbed me the wrong way. Goody two shoes, gold digger. Ha!

I was impressed with how Collins dealt with such kindness to characters like Ezra Jennings and Gooseberry. He illustrated that smarts, usefulness, and merit are not solely attributes of those who look normal. Ezra Jennings' story was particularly heartbreaking. His selflessness in not bringing a shadow into Franklin Blake's happiness because of his death was remarkable. Such a sad passing that was.

This was a first class mystery with no real murder until the end. It was fun reading the techniques that were adopted to find out the truth behind the stealing of the diamond.

What did you think of the book? Share any and all thoughts in the comments.

Next up...

The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby by Charles Dickens. Because he is Dickens after all, Mustich does not focus on just one book by the prolific author. His write up about Dickens in 1000 Books can be found on pages 215 - 222, with commentary on Nicholas Nickleby on page 218. He refers to the book as "Pure Storytelling Bliss." (This text is from the introduction/sign-up post for this year's project.)

This read-along will run from June to September. I will post the reading schedule in May.

Sunday, March 31, 2024

1000 Books Project 2024 - The Moonstone Discussion Three


If you are not reading along, be aware of potential spoilers ahead.

What started off as a seemingly boring reading section quickly turned into quite the labyrinth! The revelations from Rosanna Spearman's letter, which seemed to obviously point to the fact that it was she, in her jealousy of Rachel and Franklin's relationship, who showed Franklin's dressing gown to Rachel. Thus, causing Rachel to believe that he had taken the diamond. Diabolically, we find that this is not the case and that, in fact, Rachel actually witnessed Franklin enter her sitting room and take the diamond from her Indian cabinet. 

I quickly started thinking that perhaps someone had hypnotized Franklin unbeknownst to him, and to us, the readers. However, I couldn't quite come up with how that could have occurred, except by some mysterious Hindu magic. But when could this have occurred, and where? Thankfully, enter Dr. Candy and his assistant, Ezra Jennings, and now perhaps we have the answer. 

How they will bring about the reenactment of the circumstances of that night is yet to be seen. In my own mind, I am utterly convinced of Franklin's innocence, though certain twists have been known to come about in mysteries such as this. We shall see how it all plays out. I'm excited to get to the bottom of it!

What did you think of the this section of our reading? Share any and all thoughts in the comments.

Here is the reading schedule if you need to reference it again. (Click link and scroll down)
I'll be back on April 30 with the final discussion post.

Thursday, February 29, 2024

1000 Books Project 2024 - The Moonstone Discussion Two


If you are not reading along, be aware of potential spoilers ahead.

To begin, can we rename Second Period, First Narrative to Second Period, The Tiresome Miss Clack? Asking for a friend. 

I am quite stumped as to why Collins chose Clack to narrate. I'm reminded of the Tom Bombadil part in The Fellowship of the Ring, which I felt was quite tedious and unnecessary. Yes, Clack's narrative did advance the story, but I'm wondering if it was meant as comic relief, or was it a way for Collins to show his disdain for Christianity? I did read that adding this narrative was a way to show the opposing forces of Christianity and Hinduism. Collins professed himself a Christian, but he was also a freethinker, and he did oppose dogmas and creeds because he felt they led to persecution and war. As a non-religious freethinker myself, I just found Clack to be tiresome (as noted above). I was also reminded of Ichabod Crane, who is written as comic relief in The Legend of Sleepy Hollow. Clack's self-awareness (even though she would deny it) is very much like Ichabod's. Yet, where his inflated perception of himself falls to more secular leaning (a singer with a talent like no other, intellectual superiority due to his education), Clack's inflated self-perception comes from her thinking she is beyond reproach because she is a Christian. Honestly, some of the things she thought and said brought to mind a certain subset of Christians in this country who use their Christian status to declare superiority, but to also state quite publicly that Christians are persecuted. Oh, and I forgot to mention...don't get me started on her proselytizing. She is relentless!!

Here are the passages I highlighted...

"...the true Christian never yields. Neither public nor private influences produce the slightest effect on us, when we have once got our mission."

"We are above reason; we are beyond ridicule; we see with nobody's eyes, we hear with nobody's ears, we feel with nobody's hearts, but our own. Glorious, glorious privilege! And how is it earned: Ah, my friends, you may spare yourselves the useless inquiry! We are the only people who can earn it--for we are the only people who are always right." 

"Oh, Rachel! Rachel!...Haven't you seen yet, that my heart yearns to make a Christian of you? Has no inner voice told you that I am trying to do for you, what I was trying to do for your dear mother when death snatched her out of my hands? I don't understand your reference to my mother," [Rachel] said. "Miss Clack, will you have the goodness to explain yourself?"

"...I stated the view with which sound doctrines does not scruple to regard the awful calamity of dying unprepared. Rachel started back from me...with a scream of horror. [Rachel said] "Come away, for God's sake, before that woman can say any more! Oh, think of my poor mother's harmless, useful, beautiful life! You were at the funeral, Mr. Bruff; you saw how everybody loved her; you saw the poor helpless people crying at her grave over the loss of their best friend. And that wretch stands there, and tries to make me doubt that my mother, who was an angel on earth, is an angel in heaven now! Don't stop to talk about it! Come away! It stifles me to breathe the same air with her! It frightens me to feel that we are in the same room together!"

[Clack] 
"Is there more to be added to this plain statement of facts--to this touching picture of a Christian persecuted by the world?"  

"And when I die--to complete the return on my part of good for evil--she will have the LIFE, LETTERS, AND LABOURS OF MISS JANE ANN STAMPER left her as a legacy by my will."


My goodness...to say to a person that has just lost a loved one, to imply that said person is going to hell. That is not Christian goodness. We also see that she plans to proselytize even beyond death. Relentless woman! 

So, we are past this "tiresome" narrative. Whatever the true reasoning Collins had in presenting this part of the narrative in such a way, I can only imagine the discussions it has provoked over the many years since it was written. 

From this narrative, we now know that Rachel was set to marry Franklin Blake, but had discovered something about him that makes her not want to be with him, but she also feels she cannot be with anyone else. I'm sure we will see what Blake has done to warrant Rachel's decision as we continue on in the story. 

What did you think of the this section of our reading? Share any and all thoughts in the comments.

Here is the reading schedule if you need to reference it again. (Click link and scroll down)
I'll be back on March 31 with the next discussion post.


Thursday, February 1, 2024

1000 Books Project 2024 - The Moonstone Discussion One


If you are not reading along, be aware of potential spoilers ahead.

I wasn't sure what to expect upon beginning this book. I have read The Woman in White, which I loved. But this book takes an entirely different tone. I'm reminded of Agatha Christie and other similar mystery authors. I can easily see that Collins could have been influential for many mystery authors. Sergeant Cuff reminded me of a Hercule Poirot/Detective Columbo mashup. His whistling of "The Last Rose of Summer" reminded me of a tactic used by many a detective to "throw them off the scent" so to speak, though Mr. Betteredge seems to have thought of it as more of a tell, indicating that Cuff has had a breakthrough. Maybe it was that too.

I have to mention a couple of passages that make this very indicative of the time it was written. 

In Chapter IV, Mr. Betteredge is speaking with Rosanna and, as she was sitting beside him, his thought was "When you want to comfort a woman by the shortest way, take her on your knee. I thought of this golden rule." Um, that certainly wouldn't fly in this day and age. I know he's a kindly older gentleman, but still. It seems it would be odd to have someone sit on your lap that was not your daughter. As I said, a sign of the time this book was written.

This one was a doozy. In Chapter XVII, Penelope asks her father (Betteredge) to speak with Rosanna. His inner thought again..."But it is a maxim of mine that men (being superior creatures) are bound to improve women..if they can. When a woman wants me to do anything (my daughter, or not, it doesn't matter), I always insist on knowing why. The oftener you make them rummage their own minds for a reason, the more manageable you will find them in all the relations of life. It isn't their fault (poor wretches!) that they act first and think afterwards; it's the fault of the fools who humour them." In my experience, men act first and think afterwards, but I digress. No wonder it took so long to get the right to vote when men had this kind of attitude toward us. Sadly, there are some who would love to go back to this (and some women who wouldn't even care..egads!). Poor wretches indeed! Ugh.

Now that my outrage is out of the way. Ha! I will just say that this is a first rate mystery and I can't wait to read the next section. 

What did you think of the first section? Share any and all thoughts in the comments.

Here is the reading schedule if you need to reference it again. (Click link and scroll down)
I'll be back on February 29 with the next discussion post.

Tuesday, January 2, 2024

2023 Yearly Challenges - Wrap-Up Post

This is the wrap-up post for the 2023 yearly challenges...

2023 Book to Movie, 2023 Read Your Shelf, and the 1000 Books Project: Banned Books 2023.

I'm posting the links to the 2023 challenges below. If you completed the challenge (or even if you didn't) and you post a wrap-up, please link up in the original linky on the challenge sign up post. When you put your name/blog name, just add "wrap-up." Like so: truebookaddict/wrap-up

Here are the links to the 2023 challenges:

2023 Read Your Shelf Challenge

2023 Book to Movie Reading Challenge

1000 Books Project: Banned Books 2023

Be sure to leave a comment on the post so I know you added your wrap-up.

In case you missed the sign-up for this year's yearly challenges, you can find them below.

2024 Read Your Shelf Challenge

2024 Book to Movie (and TV) Reading Challenge

Here's to a new year of reading!